| Organizations on NCCAM's Strategic Plan: IHPC, ACCAHC, AHMA, AANP, IAYT, NCH, AANMC and MTF | |
Summary: That NCCAM's 2011-2015 strategic plan is critically important to the future of the integrative practice field is clear from this set of stakeholder responses. Together, these 8 organizations represent over 360,000 licensed practitioners: Integrated Healthcare Policy Consortium, Academic Consortium for Complementary and Alternative Health Care, American Holistic Medical Association, Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges, International Association of Yoga Therapists, Massage Therapy Foundation, National Center for Homeopathy and American Association of Naturopathic Physicians. (The two consortia represent 22 separate partner or member organizations.) Notably, their comments are almost entirely supportive of the direction Congress mandated but in which NCCAM poorly invested under its first director. If this input is valued, NCCAM has significant stakeholder backing for complying with Congress' real pragmatic research mandate.
Organizations on NCCAM's Strategic Plan: IHPC, ACCAHC, AHMA, AANP, IAYT, NCH, AANMC and MTF
Summary: That NCCAM's 2011-2015 strategic plan is critically important to the future of the integrative practice field is clear from this set of stakeholder responses. Together, these 8 organizations represent over 360,000 licensed practitioners: Integrated Healthcare Policy Consortium, Academic Consortium for Complementary and Alternative Health Care, American Holistic Medical Association, Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges, International Association of Yoga Therapists, Massage Therapy Foundation, National Center for Homeopathy and American Association of Naturopathic Physicians. (The two consortia represent 22 separate partner or member organizations.) Notably, their comments are almost entirely supportive of the direction Congress mandated but in which NCCAM poorly invested under its first director. If this input is valued, NCCAM has significant stakeholder backing for complying with Congress' real pragmatic research mandate.
Send your comments to
[email protected]
for inclusion in a future Integrator.
Related articles:
The direction the NIH National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine takes with its 2011-2015 strategic plan is the most significant decision point for the integrative practice field since complementary, alternative and integrative medicine arrived on the national scene 15 years ago. The two articles above are evidence of the importance the Integrator gives the topic. This article, with full length submissions from 8 significant organizations - one of which is a consortium of 15 national organizations and another with 7 partner organizations - provides a significant look at NCCAM's most significant stakeholders. The submissions are from the:
- Integrated Healthcare Policy Consortium
- Academic Consortium for Complementary and Alternative Health Care
- Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges
- International Association of Yoga Therapists
- Massage Therapy Foundation
- National Center for Homeopathy
- American Association of Naturopathic Physicians
These responses are offered in full so community leaders can see the depth of their alignment. look for your own points of continuity. I offer some brief comments at the end.
Note: I have sought the submission from a variety of organizations, including the influential Consortium of Academic Health Centers for Integrative Medicine (which was the only organization which merited NCCAM mention in the strategic planning white paper) but the response was not available prior to this publication.
_________________________________________
1. Integrated Healthcare Policy Consortium (IHPC)
Synopsis: Integrated Healthcare Policy Consortium (IHPC) sent
an "Alert" to their list with these key points: Now is the time for "tough love" as
NCCAM should support research that facilitates the integration
of CAM into mainstream healthcare and hasn't been; promotes more licensed
complementary and alternative medicine practitioners on the NCCAM advisory
council; urges funding for pragmatic, outcomes-based research that gathers "data on
costs and other factors that payers and policymakers use when deciding
what to include in their plans."
Dear [IHPC Alert recipient]:
NCCAM is listening...make your voice
heard!
Right
now, in the midst of Thanksgiving celebrations, we have an opportunity to
influence the direction of what is arguably the most important federal agency
for the field of integrated health care.
|
|
|
NCCAM is not just supposed to
support rarified
reductionist science.
NCCAM is supposed to support research
that facilitates the
integration of CAM
into mainstream healthcare.
|
Most of
you already know what NCCAM is, but let me remind us all. The National Center
for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) at NIH is the ONLY Federal
body whose primary job is exploring not only the effects of complementary and
alternative medicine, but also its integration. That is right, the
legislation that created NCCAM says explicitly that this agency is charged with
studying, “…the integration of alternative treatment, diagnostic and
prevention systems, modalities, and disciplines with the practice of
conventional medicine…and into health care delivery systems in the United
States.” NCCAM is not just supposed to support rarified
reductionist science exploring the effect of a single herb out of a complex
formula -- NCCAM is supposed to support research that facilitates the
integration of CAM into mainstream healthcare.
Take
action now to help them remember that charge!
At IHPC we believe that NCCAM is a vital
part of the movement for integrated, wellness-oriented healthcare. Members of
the IHPC board were instrumental in the creation of NCCAM.
|
|
Time for tough love
We support NCCAM. And sometimes
support takes the form of tough love,
and now, while NCCAM is completing
Strategic Plan it is important for us to
help them fulfill their mission with some
forthright advice.
|
|
Please join us by sending a letter to
NCCAM’s Director, Dr. Josie Briggs, and tell her that NCCAM needs to
fulfill its mission in two important ways – and we have
supported it ever since. Sometimes support takes the form of tough love,
and right now, while NCCAM is completing its next 5-year Strategic Plan and is
calling for public comment it is important for us to help them fulfill their
real mission with some forthright advice.
1) As we have told them before, NCCAM must adhere to the law that
created them and that specified that “… at least half of the members of the
advisory council who are not ex officio members shall be licensed
practitioners of one or more of the major systems with which the Center is
concerned, and at least 3 individuals representing the interests of
individual consumers of complementary and alternative medicine.” The
legislators required that NCCAM be advised not only by researchers, but mostly
by patients and providers of complementary and alternative health care.
That was a stroke of wisdom when they wrote it, and it still is.
|
|
|
NCCAM must start funding the pragmatic,
outcomes-based research that gathers
data on costs and
other factors that
payers and policymakers use.
|
2) NCCAM must start funding the kind of research that will
facilitate the integration of CAM into mainstream health care delivery.
This means pragmatic, outcomes-based research that gathers data on costs and
other factors that payers and policymakers use when deciding what to include in
their plans.
Both of these issues are named in the legislation that created NCCAM 10 years
ago. Now the legislature and you and I must hold NCCAM to their
mandate.
Take action now – by the end of
Monday, November 30th – and send a clear message to both Dr. Briggs and to
Senator Harkin, the Chair of the Senate HELP Committee which oversees NCCAM and
its funding.
The action we take today will directly influence the direction NCCAM takes for
the next five years. Let’s create something now that we can all be
thankful for in November of 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014!
And thank you, for working with us on this.
Janet
Kahn, PhD
Executive Director
2. Academic Consortium for Complementary and Alternative Health Care (ACCAHC)
Synopsis: Academic Consortium for Complementary and Alternative Health Care
(ACCAHC) - Three main points: research on whole practices; research on "costs,
cost-effectiveness, cost-offsets and cost-savings" and, third, investment in capacity in the licensed CAM fields, in "the expansion
of investment in the development of researchers who are graduates of
complementary and alternative medicine programs, particularly those who
have a continued association with the accredited CAM schools."
Dear
Dr. Briggs and Strategic Planning Team Members:
We
are writing in response to your October 2009 solicitation of stakeholder input
on the next strategic plan for the NIH National Center for Complementary and
Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). Thank you for your preliminary work and for this
opportunity to respond.
The
12 core ACCAHC member organizations (see left column) serve the distinctly
licensed complementary and alternative healthcare disciplines of chiropractic
medicine, acupuncture and Oriental medicine, naturopathic medicine, massage
therapy and direct-entry midwifery. In addition, ACCAHC’s members include 3
organizations from non-licensed Traditional World Medicines fields of yoga and
Ayurvedic medicine that are engaging in self-regulatory efforts. The ACCAHC
disciplines provide the majority of the complementary and alternative medicine
and integrative services for consumers in the United States. Similarly, 187 of
our universities, colleges and programs are accredited through specialized U.S.
Department of Education-recognized accrediting agencies. These institutions are
the educational providers for the vast majority of future integrative practitioners.
We view ourselves as a significant NCCAM stakeholder.
We
have identified the following three areas as the top, shared priorities for
research investment across our licensed professions. We believe that investment
in these three areas will have the most potentially positive impact on US
healthcare.
|
|
We need to
learn more about
the real world outcomes of these
disciplines in order to
understand
the experience of consumers and
the value of these practices in
healthcare delivery.
|
|
1. Research on whole practices– We need to
learn more about the real world outcomes of these disciplines in order to
understand the experience of consumers and the value of these practices in
healthcare delivery. We urge the evaluation of the effectiveness of the actual,
multi-dimensional practices of the members of these disciplines. A subset of
this exploration could include evaluating the preventive outcomes of the
clinical approaches that are a common orientation of integrative healthcare practitioners
in the ACCAHC disciplines. These whole practices frequently
include many of the lifestyle-related interventions that are recommended to
combat numerous chronic diseases.
Resumes are useful in employment decisions. I provide this background so that you may understand what informs the work which you may employ in your own. I have been involved as an organizer-writer in the emerging fields......more | |
|
|
Popular & Related Products
Popular & Featured Events
Dimensions of Wellness
|
|